Re: Re: Rpm
Haris said:
RX8 is faster than 330Ci if u compare 6 speed. vs. 6 spd. Nothing beats rotary and amazing HP/L ratio.
I question whether or not the 330 ci 6 speed is slower than the RX8, particularly under REAL WORLD conditions:
330ix: (all wheel drive version of the 330i and therefore HEAVIER):
0 -60: 6.2
1/4 mile: 14.7 @ 96 MPH
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2038a.shtml
That's comparable to the RX8, but the BMW's power is more readily available, since it makes a LOT more TORQUE:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=15&article_id=4346&page_number=5
"With the help of an 8000-rpm clutch drop and the engine buzzing like a flock of angry hornets, the RX-8 scooted to 60 mph in 5.9 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 14.5 seconds at 96 mph. But that performance falls off considerably without a tire-frying launch. In our street-start test from 5 to 60 mph, the RX-8 needed 7.5 seconds—1.6 seconds longer than the hard-launch time, which is twice the deficit we found with either of the other cars. And despite its trim weight and short gearing (20 mph per 1000 rpm in sixth), the RX-8 also had the slowest top-gear acceleration times by a wide margin."
And who cares about HP/L on the STREET, where there is NO SANCTIONING BODY limiting engine size?
In terms of fuel consumption/liter, rotataries SUCK - literally! The Z06 Corvette gets MUCH BETTER fuel economy than the RX8, despite the fact that it makes 155 HP MORE and mountains more of torque!
HP/pound of engine weight is more meaningful, since engine WEIGHT more adveresly impacts vehicle dynamics (as opposed to engine displacement).